It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:57 pm

All times are UTC + 2 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:16 pm 
I was trying to determine a good strategy for the upcoming rock rally competition this Saturday to earn as many points as possible and then I encountered a possible loophole in the scoring system.

For those not familiar with the basic scoring system, here is a brief description: your handicap grade is your ((highest redpoint the past year)+(highest flash the past year)/2) which equals 25 in my case. Then you earn 70 points for doing a route at this grade but 10 points per grade less for doing a route easier than your handicap grade (and 10 points more per grade for a route harder than this grade).

See the figure below to determine the number of routes to climb of a certain grade to earn the same number of points as if you climbed 1 route at your handicap grade. The graph shows that Sam has to climb 1 18 to earn the same number of points as I would climbing 7 19s or about 2 21s (or 1 25). The graph also shows that if I downclimbed an 11 I would also earn 70 points (if this means I climbed the route -1 number of times).

total number points= sum_i [(number routes at grade_i)*(70+10*(grade_i-hadicapgrade))]

So the question is how can we do a route a negative number of times? is it safe to assume by climbing it from the top downwards you have done it -1 times or do you need to be upside down as well, or is it not possible?


 Post subject: Thesis
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:25 pm 
:!: Brilliant, perhaps you could get your next doctorate in \"Climbing Competition Scoring Systems\"

 Post subject: democracy
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:26 pm 
Come on, I am trying to do a poll here (I realize now I put it in the wrong forum directory, but then again the world aint perfect) so that I have a leg to stand on Saturday when push comes to shove. My vote is 'yes' - that descending a route without aid of the rope from top to bottom would count as doing the climb -1 times.

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 7:34 pm 
It would probably be simpler to jump down the route, this would save us all having strain our brains over upside down math next rock rally! :lol: Just kidding :wink:

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:48 pm 
To negatively climb the route you will need to float to the top of the route while attatched to a rope (i.e. the negative of abseiling) before attempting your downclimb.

I would say go for it, negative climbing is the way forward...i mean backwards

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:54 pm 
Nice one Nani. I think you must ask your belay partner to insult and abuse you as much as possible whilst climbing. This should change your climbing from a positive experience to a negative one and thus you should earn maximum points. I hear you are already partnering with Gordon so the abuse shouldnt be a problem.

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 1:05 pm 
I think that you may be onto something...

If you've done a route x number of times, then you've done it x number of times (x being a number > 0)

If you've tried a route, but haven't done it, then you've done it 0 times.

What if you've never tried it? This is different to having failed on it (certainly from a climbing perspective this is true, because you could still onsight or flash the route).

Therefore, I propose the you should get -1 for each route that you have never tried. This strategy should work very well against Clinton who has done everything x times.

There could be an arguement for -2 for routes that you've never seen...

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], RockRay, Yahoo [Bot]

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group